In a bid to bolster Vietnam’s investment climate and adapt to evolving challenges, Party General Secretary and President Tô Lâm has emphasized the necessity for a stable yet flexible legal framework. Speaking at a meeting focused on institutional improvement and law enforcement in Hà Nội, Lâm outlined a vision for laws that not only provide certainty regarding rights and obligations but also remain agile enough to accommodate scientific advancements, new business models, climate change, and international integration.
Lâm highlighted the importance of a close connection between lawmaking and enforcement. He noted that the effectiveness of the legal system should be measured by its ability to dismantle administrative and investment barriers, lower compliance costs, unlock resources, and protect the lawful rights and interests of citizens and businesses alike.
A comprehensive review of current legal documents is needed, according to Lâm, especially those that impede investment, production, and business activities. He called for authorities to address issues affecting the reorganized state apparatus and the exercise of citizens’ rights, setting long-term goals for Vietnam’s legal system with measurable targets for 2030. By 2045, Vietnam should aim to have a modern legal framework supported by digital data, artificial intelligence, and a professional, transparent judicial system.
Lâm also stressed the importance of accountability in the implementation of laws and policies. He advocated for clear identification of responsible agencies, required resources, implementation conditions, and expected results for each policy. Administrative documents should not impose requirements beyond those established by law.
Furthermore, Lâm urged a shift in focus from punitive measures to preventative strategies in managing legal compliance and risks. Emphasizing digital transformation and data-based governance, he suggested these tools could enhance compliance, reduce administrative costs, and streamline the resolution of civil and commercial disputes.